Monday 19 July 2010

The Christian Delusion: Why Faith Fails

Here's the latest book causing a wee stir amongst the Atheist/Agnostic/ex-Christian scene:




Below is a summary from an ex-Christian blogger:


April 10, 2010
By Ken R. Pulliam (Atlanta, GA)    
This review is from: The Christian Delusion: Why Faith Fails (Paperback)
This newly published book is an anthology containing 15 chapters written by 9 scholars, most of which were at one time conservative Christians. It surveys the problems with Christianity from a number of different angles--sociological, psychological, scientific, historical, and biblical. It is the probably the single best volume available today to debunk evangelical Christianity. It brings together a variety of arguments into one work, that prior to its publication, would have required one to sift through dozens of books to find them. While there are some areas that still could be covered, for example, the immoral and illogical nature of the atonement (a topic near to my heart), nevertheless, it covers most of the bases.

Chapter One is written by anthropologist David Eller and discusses how Christianity is a phenomena that can be understood purely on cultural and sociological grounds.

Chapter Two is by psychologist Valerie Tarico who examines the concept of belief (or faith) as it is presently understood by neurologists and shows that it is rarely based on evidence or arguments.

Chapter Three is by pharmacist Jason Long who deals with how religious ideas develop in people and how they hold on to them regardless of the evidence.

Chapter Four is by former Pastor and Christian apologist John Loftus who explains his Outsider Test for Faith. He invites people to "step outside" of their belief system and evaluate their religion in the same way they would evaluate a religion that they do not hold.

Chapter Five is by librarian Ed Babinski who has studied Young Earth Creationism extensively. He clearly presents the pre-scientific understanding of the cosmos as held by biblical writers and shows that it is impossible to reconcile that understanding with what is currently known in science.

Chapter Six is by author (The Rejection of Pascal's Wager: A Skeptic's Guide to the Bible and the Historical Jesus ) Paul Tobin who shows that the historical criticism of the Bible reveals that it contains errors, inconsistencies, myths, legends, and forgeries.

Chapter Seven has John Loftus returning to demonstrate how the Bible fails to communicate clearly. He shows how interpretational conflicts over the meaning of Scripture has led to millions of deaths as well as untold suffering through the ages. He argues that one would expect an omniscient God to be able to communicate his will in a much better fashion.

Chapter Eight is by biblical scholar Hector Avalos and discusses why the God of the Old Testament is a cruel and monstrous tyrant in spite of Christian apologists attempt to justify him.

Chapter Nine is my favorite chapter in the book. In it John Loftus returns to lay out the problem of animal suffering and examine 8 different ways Christians have tried to reconcile that suffering with a good God. He shows convincingly that each Christian answer fails and that there is no reconciliation possible.

Chapter Ten is by NT scholar Robert Price who, in his own unique and sarcastic way, demolishes the attempts by evangelicals to wiggle out of the implications of biblical criticism.

Chapter Eleven is by historian Richard Carrier who applies the Outsider Test of Faith to the "historical evidence" put forward by Christian apologists for the resurrection. He demonstrates conclusively that if one treats the NT as historians treat every other ancient document, the teaching that Jesus of Nazareth rose from the dead is untenable.

Chapter Twelve brings John Loftus back again to show that Jesus of Nazareth is but one in a long list of failed apocalyptic prophets. He demonstrates that Jesus taught the world would end in the lifetime of the disciples and that all of the first century believers including Paul thought Jesus would return at any moment. He goes on to show how Christians have had to rethink their eschatological ideas in light of the failure of Jesus to return.

Chapter Thirteen is a repeat performance by David Eller in which he explodes a commonly held myth that morality must be based on a divine being. He proves that morality is merely an expression of one's culture.

Chapter Fourteen has Hector Avalos returning to deal with the argument put forward by Christians that the holocaust and the other atrocities committed by Adolph Hitler were a result of Darwinian or atheistic ideology. He shows that instead Hitler's motivating factors were actually the example of the Roman Catholic Church and the teaching of Martin Luther about the Jews.

Chapter Fifteen is another essay by Richard Carrier in which he shows the absurdity of the Christian claim that modern science is based upon the precepts of the Christian worldview.

Once again, this is an excellent volume and I highly recommend it to anyone who is willing to examine the evidence and think seriously about the Christian faith. I am sure many Christians will be afraid to read it or even advised by their leaders not to read it. But as Socrates is reported to have said: "The unexamined life is not worth living."


7 comments:

Edwardtbabinski said...

Hi Troy, Price's writings and personal discussions had an influence on me as well, back when I was born again and met him and tried to win him back to the conservative fold, way back in the late 1970s! I met him when he was still in the midst of obtaining his first master's degree, around the time he was writing Beyond Born Again. He typed out an annotated book list for me of theological works, like the one on his website today and discussed the apocalyptic Jesus view. I attended some of his heretic's anonymous meetings at Montclair State when he was a campus minister there, and he published several of my articles in the campus ministry journal, Faith and Thought. In fact that's where I published my first piece, "The Varieties of Scientific Creationism." Today, 30 years later John Loftus published a more recent and more complete piece on the same topic in The Christian Delusion, titled, "The Cosmology of the Bible." My testimony and also Price's is featured in Leaving the Fold: Testimonies of Former Fundamentalists that I edited for Prometheus. Bob was still a liberal Christian minister at that time. My testimony from that book (that mentions Bob) is also online http://www.edwardtbabinski.us/leaving_the_fold/babinski_agnosticism.html

-blessed holy socks, the non-perishable-zealot said...

Egads! Faith fails because we fail, brudda! Not the other way around. YOU, brudda, will never make the Great Beyond for promoting a filthy book like that. I'm warning you, friend. God bless you with discernment.

Why I Don't Believe said...

Thanks for the warning. I know you mean well.

Anonymous said...

Troy,

All this stuff is just "more words". When I read this stuff I often feel like I am just reading another religion - anti-Christianity. Not all of it stacks up in examination and thus the authors seem to be as fallible as the Christians they write against.

Perhaps it's about time anti-Christians just need to accept that reason can never really undermine faith, but merely props up one's own preconceptions and bias. In other words, they are just as guilty of doing what they themselves write against. They are what they set out to avoid.

God loves you anyway my friend, even though neither of us can really ever understand the details of that love.

An old friend from Aust...

Why I Don't Believe said...

Well 'old friend', I have long said that this blog is not the final word on anything. It's just a collection of things I have found along the way. You're entitled to faith, but it's an empty well to me.

Why I Don't Believe said...

But may I ask what is published on my blog that doesnt 'stack up'?

Anonymous said...

Dear Troy,

I was mainly speaking of the contents of the book you cited, that I don't think "stacks up". It's not really a comment on your personal words. You're a good man on an interesting journey.

All the best...

"An old friend from Aust"